Fri 16 Oct 2009
Where the Wild Things Are
By Cassandra Z. Hughes
[3] Comments

“Just one more dune?”, You said that three dunes ago!

WINNER:
Art Direction (K.K. Barrett & Simon McCutcheon)
Costume Design (Casey Storm)
NOMINEE:
Cinematography (Lance Acord)
Song (“Hideaway” by Karen O)
Theatrical Release Date: 10/16/2009
Director: Spike Jonze
Cast: Max Records, Pepita Emmerichs, Catherine Keener, Steve Mouzakis, Mark Ruffalo, James Gandolfini(voice), Paul Dano(voice), Catherine O’Hara(voice), Forest Whitaker(voice), Michael Berry Jr.(voice), Chris Cooper(voice), Lauren Ambrose(voice)
Based on the beloved children’s book, this 94 min rendition of Maurice Sendak’s “Where the Wild Things Are” features a wildly, imaginative little boy and seven larger than life monsters. The film is impressively well done but also overwhelming depressing, making this adaptation much less kid-friendly and not nearly as light-hearted as the book.
From a production standpoint, thanks to Jim Henson’s creature shop, it was as if the monsters had leapt straight from the pages. The degree of detail and expressive nature of the costumes really brought the monsters to life and imbued each character with a unique personality.
The soundtrack is a combination of soothing lullaby-like melodies. Overall, the primarily instrumental soundtrack helps to reflect and magnify the wonder of a child’s imagination and the sadness of growing up.
I have always had a soft spot for the book, with fond childhood memories of it. I always loved Max’s (Max Records) rambunctious, impish ways and his inventive imagination. I loved the monsters, particularly Carol. James Gandolfini as Carol touched my heart and made me ache for my childhood. I loved the imagery and numerous touching moments interspersed throughout the movie.
What I disliked about this movie is a little more intangible, but has to do with the translation from written word to film. The actual book is very short. In fact, the text is only 10 sentences with a simplistic plot driven by one good, but mischievous boy’s imagination. The film did a good job stretching the material into a full-length movie, but the adaptation is dark and a little too scary for little ones. In good conscious, I can only recommend this for kids 10 years and up, creating my biggest problem with the movie. By adapting this book into a more adult themed movie, it becomes much less accessible to it’s original audience … children.
“Where the Wild Things Are” is a decent adaptation of a beloved book (a solid 3 out of 5), but is too scary for small children as the little one behind me made abundantly clear. I recommend that parents see this one first before taking children under 10 years of age.


Rantrave.com -
A place to rant and rave about everything that matters.
October 17th, 2009 at 7:20 pm
Overall, I think I’d have given this film 3.5 out of 5. The production design, cinematography and costumes are absolutely fantastic and should garner some people a few statuettes. I also think that director Spike Jonze did an excellent job of choosing shots and framing the action on-screen.
I had a few issues with pacing and feel a little like the story resolution had some elements missing but overall enjoyed it.
I do agree with Cassandra completely though that kids under 10 probably aren’t the best audience for this. I think there are only 2 or 3 scenes that might give the kids some real scares (if you like calming your kids down after a nightmare, then enjoy) but the bigger issue is that the film is very much geared towards adults and it might leave the little ones a bit bored.
October 21st, 2009 at 10:22 am
Honestly, I was really torn on what to give this film, but decided finally on a 3 because it missed what I considered to be the target audience. Otherwise, I completely agree with your assessment.
October 21st, 2009 at 6:07 pm
It’s no fun when we agree.