Thu 5 May 2011
Thor
By Ian Forbes
[7] Comments
Anyone order the Asgardian Beefcake?
Theatrical Release Date: 05/06/2011
Director: Kenneth Branagh
Cast: Chris Hemsworth, Natalie Portman, Tom Hiddleston, Anthony Hopkins, Stellan Skarsgård, Kat Dennings, Clark Gregg, Jaimie Alexander, Ray Stevenson, Josh Dallas, Tadanobu Asano, Idris Elba, Colm Feore
Rated: PG-13 for sequences of intense sci-fi action and violence.
Runtime: 1 hour, 54 minutes
Trailer:
It’s Hammer Time!
“Thor” was meant to be the beginning of the summer movie season. But “Fast Five” roared out of the gates last week and got that job done with over $80 million in opening weekend box office (domestically).
Still, I’m sure there are high hopes for the Norse god of thunder as Thor is yet another property that Paramount and Marvel is hoping will not only become a franchise in its own right but also pump up the interest in next summer’s “Avengers” movie (being directed by fanboy wet dream Joss Whedon).
The good news, and this is me being creatively lazy, is that “Thor” works. Chris Hemsworth was a perfect fit for the role, able to pull off both the arrogance and humility required. He also knows his way around the weight room, as anyone inclined to admire the male form will attest to after seeing him waltz around without a shirt on (this scene seemed to go on a bit long … but then again no one would accuse me of knowing where the gym is even located).
Helping to keep the stuffy Norse elements from turning an action movie into a complete Shakespeare festival (remember, it’s Kenneth Branagh in the director’s chair), this isn’t just about Thor, his father Odin (Anthony Hopkins), and his brother Loki (Tom Hiddleston). Fans of the comic will be happy to see the Warriors Three (Ray Stevenson, Josh Dallas, Tadanobu Asano) and Sif (Jaimie Alexander) also tag along on our hero’s quests.
Of course, for those of us who live in Midgard (Earth to those who have a life), the story isn’t all about rainbow bridges and frost giants. Our perspective is handled via scientist Jane Foster (Natalie Portman), her associate Erik Selvig (Stellan Skarsgård) and intern/comic relief Darcy Lewis (Kat Dennings). They run into Thor once he’s been sent to Earth (sorry if this sentence elicits groans from anyone who’s seen the film).
Thor eventually fills them in on the connection between Asgard and Earth, all while they mix it up with S.H.I.E.L.D. personnel like Agent Coulson (Clark Gregg), who serves as the main link between the Marvel properties leading up to the aforementioned Avengers movie.
There are thankfully more action scenes than expected, though the need to set up Thor’s origins slows things down from time to time. Also, the opening battle scene requires significant CGI and was reminiscent of some of the large scale battles seen in “The Lord of the Rings”; only these looked a little too fake and more like a cut scene from a video game than something in a major motion picture. And the 3D won’t distract you from the film but it certainly isn’t so amazing that forgoing the extra costs is probably a better bet.
Seeing as comic book properties are largely critic proof, droning on and on about each element seems unnecessary. The bottom line is that “Thor” is entertaining and will probably please fans of the Marvel franchises as well as casual filmgoers with no attachment to the comic, so it gets a 3.5 out of 5. The pacing could have been a little better, somehow “Fast Five” feels shorter even though it has 15 more minutes of runtime, but that’s really the biggest complaint since I’m only concerned with judging this against other Marvel franchise films.
And of course, like every film meant to tease the upcoming “Avengers” project, stick around for the end of the credits for an extra scene. (Though it was nice that one Avenger makes his cameo within the main movie rather than just being tacked on to whet fanboy appetites.)




Rantrave.com -
A place to rant and rave about everything that matters.
May 11th, 2011 at 12:24 am
It’s not nearly as fun on earth as it was off it as Sif and Warriors Three found out. The most fun part for me was trying to figure when and where Agent Coulson will appear, and as usual Gregg delivered some of the funniest lines. You forgot to mention Idris Elba as Heimdall. He was good in that role.
Still, funny how it’s not as fun as Fast Five nor the stake felt as big, isn’t it?
May 11th, 2011 at 12:49 am
I didn’t *forget* Elba so much as I gave it a pass. I still think casting him and Tadanobu Asano as Asgardians was a dumb PC move – though the actors themselves were fine, it’s one thing to update scripts made in the modern context but to throw in token minorities to established mythologies/historical eras is lazy.
Why not let Denzel play Hitler? Ian McShane as Genghis Khan? Cate Blanchett as Rosa Parks?
And you’re dead on that Fast Five is more fun, I’m not surprised it did better business though. Thor isn’t a very exciting Marvel character (he’s a glue guy for the Avengers) and I wouldn’t be surprised if the crappiness of Clash of the Titans last year made the notion of seeing another pantheon of Gods a bit daunting to some (especially in 3D).
May 11th, 2011 at 8:21 am
You are spot on about Asano. It’s a stunt casting and useless one. Elba, on the other hand, at least played a character that has a role in the story.
Thor on earth as human was a great story but it wasn’t explored enough.
May 11th, 2011 at 8:39 am
Yeah, I would have liked more of the story to take place on Earth but when you hire
ShakespeareBranagh to direct, you’re asking to solidify the Norse world, not ours – so not a big surprise there in this origin tale.And you’re right about Asano’s basic uselessness (Hogun was always sort of an afterthought in the comics too), but I equate his casting equally with Elba because neither should have had the roles; no matter how good they are as actors.
May 11th, 2011 at 8:22 pm
yeah, Asano was cast so the writer can use the ‘jackie chan’ line. you are right they shouldn’t have had to pc-fy the casting. Loki is good in the movie, just to point out, and not much of an origin story, was it?
the X-Men: First Class trailer was more intriguing than “Thor” the movie.
May 11th, 2011 at 8:28 pm
Loki was spot-on. Perfect casting there.
As for X-Men: First Class, I’m actually dreading it. I love the X-Men … but I love them back in the day, not in the twisted versions that have evolved in the last decade. Also, somehow Riptide is in this … who’s a Marauder … and shouldn’t be anywhere near this iteration … but whatever … the three X-films already pissed me off so if they want to keep beating a dead horse … and even if the film is entertaining, I’ll still be fundamentally unhappy because they couldn’t ever get the version of the team I wanted to see or the storylines that would make compelling films on-screen (The Brood, The Marauder Massacre, etc., etc.)
May 26th, 2011 at 12:16 am
The dullest movie I’ve seen in quite a while: two and a quarter hours of plodding predictable story told in blurry “3D” and unleavened by any humor. Bring back Tony Stark.