Tue 28 Jun 2011
Transformers: Dark of the Moon
By Ian Forbes
[6] Comments
Look! Even Megan Fox transforms in this movie!
Theatrical Release Date: 06/28/2011
Director: Michael Bay
Cast: Shia LaBeouf, Rosie Huntington-Whiteley, Josh Duhamel, John Turturro, Tyrese Gibson, Patrick Dempsey, Frances McDormand, John Malkovich, Kevin Dunn, Julie White, Alan Tudyk, Ken Jeong
Rated: PG-13 for intense prolonged sequences of sci-fi action violence, mayhem and destruction, and for language, some sexuality and innuendo.
Runtime: 2 hours, 37 minutes
Trailer:
When window cleaners run amok!
I had every intention of writing a full length film review about Michael Bay’s third entry in the Robots Look Cooler in Slo-motion Saga, “Transformers: Dark of the Moon”. However, after sitting through all 2 hours and 37 minutes of it (with credits), I’ve decided that I’m not going to write a review at all.
Instead, consider this the beginning of a formal apology … to my brain.
Dear Brain,
I almost don’t know where to start. Saying “I’m Sorry” simply doesn’t cut it.
You facilitate my body’s movement. You process all the sights, sounds and textures of the world around me. You regulate my very breath.
And yet, I keep letting you down.
I bring you with me to every film I see. Sometimes, you get a lovely, intimate film like “Beginners“, an amazing spectacle like “Scott Pilgrim vs. the World“, or even a simple popcorn flick like “Super 8” that has some flaws but still qualifies as good entertainment.
And then there are the ridiculously lousy films I submit you to: “Sucker Punch“, “Just Go With It“, and “Take Me Home Tonight“, to name just this year’s most egregious offenders.
Rather than learning from my mistakes (I even saw the Justin Bieber film), I’ve only added to your abuse in watching “Transformers: Dark of the Moon”, even after reading the YouTube comment by RazorheadX:
“to all the people complaining that Megan Fox isn’t in the movie… who gives a crap?!?!!? This is NOT freakin’ “Megan Fox and some robots Part 3″! I honestly couldn’t care less that she’s gone. Yeah, she’s good looking, but I never saw the other movies cuz of her. OPTIMUS FREAKING PRIME BABY! Total nerdgasm. Call me a geek, I don’t care, I am. btw… this movie is going to be EPIC!!!”
I mean, THIS is the demographic? Some random fanboy (or girl … but I doubt it) angry at the notion of lamenting the replacement of one hot actress for some hot model, but still jacked up beyond belief for the follow-up to “Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen“?
I spared you the assault then, forcing its tremendous craptitude on another critic … only to succumb to some macabre curiosity when that “film” made it to the home market.
But still, knowing all this, I willingly went into that theater last night and awaited whatever Michael “I Only Shoot During the Golden Hour” Bay would sling at us.
What hurt you the most? Was it the new piece of eye candy, whose full lips and bright lipstick seems like the prototypical look for a clown hooker? She wasn’t that bad, was she? I mean, when she didn’t have dialogue?
You’re right, I’m sorry.
Was it Bay’s incessant use of slow motion? His inability to understand that less is more and cutting most of the needless technique could probably have brought the running time under 2 hours? Doesn’t slowing things down help to ramp up the “cool factor”?
You’re right, I’m sorry.
Maybe what hurt the most was the ridiculously lousy 3D? It should have been amazing – Michael Bay said it would be, even stating in letters to fans and projectionists that those who wanted the best experience should shell out those extra bucks (Deadline.com). I even tried to help, removing my 3D glasses every so often … but when the whole screen goes blurry, putting those things back on at least made the picture somewhat clear … even if there still wasn’t any appreciable depth to be gained. Was that not enough?
You’re right again, and I’m sorry.
Wait a tick, I know what bothered you the most! Everything! From the new girl inexplicably attracted to Shia LaDouche, to the slow motion, to the 3D, to the dialogue, to the new characters that added nothing of significance, all of it was terrible. Even Linkin Park have given up hope, writing the lyric, “Your insides crying, ‘Save me now’”, into their featured song – paralleling what many of us in the audience were going through.
Worse still, I subjected you to 157 minutes of tedious story development just so I could write a review that no one cared about because no matter how bad the reviews will be, there will still be throngs of people plunking down their money and rewarding the producers’ pockets for their investments.
For years, the state of summer blockbusters has continued to slide as consumers demand less and less for their money; and instead reward lazy writing, directing, and acting as long as the CGI is state of the art. This will probably hold true yet again, despite the overwhelmingly shared opinion that the last installment in the franchise sucked big, huge, metal balls (kind of like the ones dangling from Devastator in the film).
Brain, I really wish there was more I could do to apologize. I’d like to say I’ll stop going to films that have less than a snowball’s chance in Hell of being, at the very least, fun. But we both know that won’t happen. I’ll continue to see terrible films (probably sooner than later) and you’ll unfortunately keep having to process whatever floats up on the screen into words and thoughts for me to describe.
So while I’m very, very … very, very … very, very sorry that I have yet again submitted you to this kind of abuse, take some comfort in knowing that I’ll try to make it up to you. See what’s in my hand? Sure, it may look like orange juice, but thanks to you moving my body and distinguishing labels on those bottles on the top shelf, there’s more than meets the eye in there.
And soon … very soon … you’ll know that I’m truly sorry and want to make it up to you.
Eternally grateful,
Ian




Rantrave.com -
A place to rant and rave about everything that matters.
June 28th, 2011 at 12:47 pm
Yeah, but I nailed Megan Fox! Ha!
June 28th, 2011 at 10:55 pm
Did your brain forgive you? ATTACK THE BLOCK is still to come. Maybe that will help.
June 28th, 2011 at 11:39 pm
Copious amounts of vodka seemed to make things better. We’ll see if “Attack the Block” works for me, it’s definitely more up your alley though.
July 1st, 2011 at 1:30 am
This is easily the funniest thing I’ve read all week. Awesome.
Why didn’t Scott Pilgrim do better at the box office? It was on my 10 best of the year list!
I do have to say — I agreed with the three movies you mentioned (beginners, super 8, etc)…but why did all the critics hate Take Me Home Tonight. It was a sloppy comedy that certainly wasn’t great, but I thought it had enough laughs to recommend.
July 1st, 2011 at 9:02 am
Glad it could make you laugh, Josh.
Scott Pilgrim didn’t do better because unless you’re already an Edgar Wright fan (which I think everyone should be), or loved the source material, I’m not sure the general public knows what to make of it all. They’re used to car chases, explosions and monsters. Also, it had no A-list actors in starring roles.
Sadly, going to back to Edgar Wright’s involvement, his U.S. box office results are as follows: Shaun of the Dead – $13.5 mil, Hot Fuzz – $23.6 mil, Scott Pilgrim – $31.5 mil. Each of those films are the kind of quality deserving of big $100+ million results but they don’t get it.
As for Take Me Home Tonight, I was offended by watching Dan Fogler attempt to channel Sam Kinison, I was offended that the film was merely a conglomeration of ideas that had been done before, and done far better. I was offended by how the use of 80s music was an attempt to drive emotion rather than something that felt organic to the film. Simply put, I was offended.
… oh, and it didn’t make me laugh – probably because I was so offended.
July 21st, 2011 at 11:26 am
Yo DawG!
I don’t preciate sum stoopid site baggin on me, Yo! This here movie was epic, and you should just admit it.
Peeece owt!